Loading...
Minnesota Criminal Justice Statute Service
Search
Subscribe to Updates
Reports
Statute Change Report
About
Glossary
Quick Search
347.515
Statute ID:
12115
Statute Function ID:
26604
Dangerous or Potentially Dangerous Dogs - Removal of Microchip Identification
In Effect
New Search
Refine Search
Back to Results
Function Details
History
Text
Charge
Classifications
Offense Level:
Misdemeanor (M)
General Offense Code:
Other (9)
Offense Summary Code & Rank:
Other/Status/Misc (M) (Rank 30)
Detailed Offense Code:
Animal Welfare (990)
Offense Severity Level:
Function Text:
Misdemeanor per 347.55 (b).
UCR Code
Description
90Z
All Other Offenses
Flags
Crime of Violence:
No
Targeted Misdemeanor:
No
Predatory Offender Registration Review:
No
Enhanceable:
No
Certify to DPS:
No
Report to DNR:
No
DPS Group:
No
Conditional Release:
No
Payable:
No
Petty Misdemeanor Only if Prosecutor Certifies:
No
Third Violation Indicator:
No
Qualified Domestic Violence Related:
No
Nonviolent Controlled Substance Offender Review:
No
Wildlife Restitution:
No
Statute Number:
347.515
Enactment Date:
Jan 1, 1859
Effective Date:
Aug 1, 2001
Expiration Date:
Repealed?:
No
Summary Text:
Dangerous or Potentially Dangerous Dogs - Removal of Microchip Identification
Statute ID:
12115
Created:
Apr 8, 2008 by mnjis.legal.analyst@state.mn.us
Updated:
Apr 8, 2008 by mnjis.legal.analyst@state.mn.us
Last Update Action:
Added
Legal Analyst Comment:
Per config request #115883
Summary Text:
Dangerous or Potentially Dangerous Dogs - Removal of Microchip Identification
Link to MN Statute Text:
https://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/347/515.html
Legislative Session:
2001 - Special 1
Session Law Text?:
No
Statute text last updated on:
Apr 8, 2008
The owner of a dangerous or potentially dangerous dog must have a microchip implanted in the dog for identification, and the name of the microchip manufacturer and identification number of the microchip must be provided to the animal control authority. If the microchip is not implanted by the owner, it may be implanted by the animal control authority. In either case, all costs related to purchase and implantation of the microchip must be borne by the dog's owner.
